In
addition to the various kinds of arguments for and against secession
presented above, three other major issues appeared in Virginia during
the secession crisis of 1860-1. The first was the issue of whether,
in case of secession, to join the Cotton States or to form a central
confederacy with the other more northern slave states. Some Virginians
came down on one side of this issue, and some on the other. For example,
in his letter, a man from Loudoun County, Virginia stated that his state
should secede and join the other Border States, not necessarily forming
a union with the Cotton States of the deep South.44 On the
other hand, in his speech in the convention, Mr. Turner argued that,
although the state should not act rashly, Virginia should join the southern
confederacy: "But if in the course of events it shall become necessary,
to take action independent of the present Union, I shall advocate the
Union of the Southern States."45
A second issue that arose was whether Virginia should act alone or seek
the help of the other Border States in determining what action to take.
In the convention, for instance, Mr. Harvie stated: "
I insist
upon it that Virginia shall deliberate, that Virginia shall determine,
without interference, without complication, what she will do in this
particular. I will never call upon those Border States to help define
what Virginia shall do."46 The opposite of this argument
is seen in Mr. Wilson's speech which stated that Virginia should seek
the advice of the other Border States through a convention before deciding
what action to take.47
A third issue was the concern over what the northwestern portion of
Virginia would do if Virginia seceded: secede from the Union with the
rest of the state or actually secede from the eastern part of the state
and remain with the Union. That this was such a major issue is demonstrated
by the many times it arose in debates in the convention. The northwestern
part