Beginning
around 1870, the major European powers Great Britain, France, Germany,
Portugal, Belgium, Italy, Russia, and the Netherlands began carving
up those areas of the globe inhabited by what they saw as "uncivilized"
peoples. Thus European imperialism extended its rule of considerable
portions of Africa and Asia. By the dawn of the twentieth century, many
theories arose as to the causes of this new wave of imperialism. John
Atkinson Hobson, who lived through this era of high imperialism, presented
in his 1902 work, Imperialism: A Study, his own theory as to why this
phenomenon was occurring. The purpose of this paper is to explore his
theory on imperialism, following his logic and explaining why he draws
the conclusions he does. In Imperialism, Hobson observes that imperialism
is inefficient for Britain; it yields no great return or economic benefit
to most people living in the imperial power, and Hobson seeks to determine
why such an unprofitable system exists. According to Hobson's theory,
imperialism arises from the generation of under-consumption and over-saving
in the capitalistic economy of the home country. Powerful financiers
seek investment opportunities with a high rate of return for their excess
savings, driving them to invest in the "uncivilized" lands
of Africa and Asia. These investors, looking to minimize risks on their
investments while maintaining their high rate of return, use their influence
to force their government to provide military protection and eventually
to annex outright the areas in which they have invested. Thus, imperialism
exists to further the interests of the investor class at the expense
of the rest of the nation.
Hobson argues that despite the fact that most people do not benefit
from imperialism, the rest of the nation supports these pursuits because
of other, non-economic forces such as a sense of moral duty, religion,
nationalism, the primitive human need for