Hagiographers
often advanced stereotypes of the female saints in their biographies
because they were expected to include "at least passing reference
to food abstention and eucharistic piety"30 for the
reason that this is what constituted an impressive holy life in the
eyes of medieval society. Consequently, it is hard to determine the
ways in which female saints differed from each other because their lives
were often exaggerated and manipulated to fit into the conventional
notion of "the saint." This model included, among other things,
food asceticism, self-mutilation, extraordinary healing powers, elaborate
visions, and the miraculous appearance of stigmata wounds (many holy
women bled mysteriously from body parts which corresponded to those
on Jesus's body which were injured during his crucifixion). It is also
difficult to speculate on the degree to which pious women were actually
imitating each other as opposed to merely being reported in their hagiographies
as similar. And if they were similar in certain ways, to what extent
were they recreating lifestyles they read about in embellished hagiographies?
The saints' biographies were written on a religious subject for a religious
audience. Even though most were written for the laity, popular culture
at the time was infused with Christian tradition. The significance of
their subject matter and audience indicates that these sources may be
somewhat unreliable. For example, the importance of food asceticism
and devotion to the eucharist had a different meaning for the holy women
than it did for their followers. While the former saw these activities
as "merely steps towards God," their awed observers saw them
as examples of the "supernatural" qualities of the saints.31
Bynum suggests that this feature of their audience led hagiographers
to overstate the more paranormal aspects of these stories.
The underlying goals of hagiographies concerning religious figures seem
to be religious themselves. Lidwina of Schiedam's hagiographer describes
her forty-day fast as "'something that is impossible or against
nature [...] but not impossible to or against God.'"32
This shows that the information is written for religious purposes. Because
the female saints were popular with the general public at the time,
stories which emphasize their miraculous feats and attributes in association
with Christian symbols and themes serve as a sort of propaganda for
the church. It is hard to draw secular conclusions about the afflictions
of the saints from this kind of source. Such writings allow one to make
inferences regarding the nature of the church or the prevailing ideas
within religious thinking at the time, but it is difficult to distill
from it solid factual information regarding the female saints.