As
the famine ran its course, it is estimated that about 1 million people
died, and another 2 million emigrated from a population that in 1845
stood at 8.5 million.24 Elsewhere the total figure
of 3 million is cited for the period of 10 years following the first
blight, and just resulting from the immediate famine years.25
A third scholar cites 1 million dead, and "at least that number" being
forced to emigrate.26 These differences clearly speak
to the difficulty of establishing a firm figure for the overall population
loss because of (most likely) underreported famine deaths and emigrations.
However, the figure of one million dead and two million transported
seems to be the estimate that has approached post-revisionist scholarly
consensus.
C. Land reform, the Gregory Clause, Famine
The structure of land ownership on the eve of the famine could best
be described as semi-feudal. O'Grada estimates that just before the
famine two thirds of the labor force was involved in farming, and of
those two thirds, "two thirds of the males deriving a livelihood from
the land held little or no land themselves."27 Particularly
in the west, where the famine was most severe and the potato was relied
upon most exclusively, a ubiquitous system of land utilization called
clachan developed. Under this system, land was abstractly held
in common by a group of families, called a baile. Property and
farming rights for the communally held land were divided through a complex
system that maximized use of arable land as an "ingenious adaptation
to the environmental conditions of the west of Ireland, where tiny patches
of glacial drift were frequently embedded in extensive areas of bog
or mountains."28
Woodham-Smith describes a similar system of communal land ownership
called the rundale system, and suggests that it caused a process
of destructive subdivision. She also describes a system called conacre,
through which the majority of agricultural labor in